On the recordMay 3, 2000
I say to the Senator, given the fact that in 35 years of title I we have not reduced it at all, a requirement to reduce it by 10 percent in 5 years is rather substantial.
Source
govinfo.govT. Gorton: “I say to the Senator, given the fact that in 35 years of title I we have not reduced it at all, a requirement to reduce…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the effectiveness of Title I funding during Senate debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
Oct 18, 2000
it has taken a considerable period of time to reach the happy conclusion of the debate over the appropriations bill for the Department of Agriculture. None of that delay is due to the distinguished chairman or to his ranking member, the…
Oct 4, 2000
Again, this was the program of the Senator from New Mexico. I do not think there was any item in the conference committee that was discussed at more length with the administration and in more detail. I am gratified the Senator was able to…
Sep 26, 2000
the Supreme Court, with eight of nine Justices concurring, has just agreed with Microsoft that the notorious prosecution of Microsoft by the Department of Justice should go through the normal process of appeal and should be determined and…
Oct 5, 2000
The Senator is correct. Section 156 states, ``nothing in this section shall be construed to expand the existing statutory authority of the Secretary.'' The interpretation suggested by our House colleagues would require additional statutory…
Other voices in this conversation
