In other words, this Senator at this point does not know whether or not Senator Harkin will prevail. Part of my amendment will depend on whether it prevails or does not prevail. I will put up one form of it. But if his prevails, I wish to substitute the second form for it. The effect will be the same. If Senator Harkin's wins and mine loses, the Byrne grants come out of star wars. If mine wins after his, it displaces his and the money comes out of the allowances with the intention that it be in the furnishings account.
T. Gorton: “In other words, this Senator at this point does not know whether or not Senator Harkin will prevail. Part of my…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to funding during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
Unfortunately, due to our subcommittee's allocation, there was not enough room in the Senate mark to cover many good Land and Water Conservation Fund projects. As the bill moves forward, if there is an opportunity to reconsider this…
The Senator is correct. Section 156 states, ``nothing in this section shall be construed to expand the existing statutory authority of the Secretary.'' The interpretation suggested by our House colleagues would require additional statutory…
it has taken a considerable period of time to reach the happy conclusion of the debate over the appropriations bill for the Department of Agriculture. None of that delay is due to the distinguished chairman or to his ranking member, the…
let's paint a picture, or set the stage, for this debate. Most of the research and development and manufacture of prescription drugs goes on here in the United States, in a highly constructive fashion. Drug companies, and their research…





