In other words, this Senator at this point does not know whether or not Senator Harkin will prevail. Part of my amendment will depend on whether it prevails or does not prevail. I will put up one form of it. But if his prevails, I wish to substitute the second form for it. The effect will be the same. If Senator Harkin's wins and mine loses, the Byrne grants come out of star wars. If mine wins after his, it displaces his and the money comes out of the allowances with the intention that it be in the furnishings account.
T. Gorton: “In other words, this Senator at this point does not know whether or not Senator Harkin will prevail. Part of my…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing amendments related to funding during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from T. Gorton
I agree with his statement that the Committee intends for Interior to study the entire NRC report carefully and to adopt a rule that is consistent with the findings and recommendations of that report.
My home state, too, has experienced the disruption that a federal endangered species listing can cause. I therefore appreciate the importance and urgency of the funds sought by the Senator from Maine.
I thank my friend, and emphasize that we did not act again this year just to ratify the actions of the Department of Interior. The Committee to reemphasize its original intent: That Interior study the NRC report carefully, and that any…
I would agree that the U.S. Forest Service should preserve the option to use such fire retardants in order to minimize the long-term visual impacts of wildfires.





