Again, I would ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment. We have heard from this side not just the content of this amendment being sort of out of whack with reality, but also when we consider whether or not it's necessary to commit a case, this is not a necessary amendment given the provisions that are already in H.R. 1960. So I ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment and yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes appeared to have it.
Rick Larsen: “Again, I would ask my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment. We have heard from this side not just the content of…”
Share
More from Rick Larsen
Thank you, Chairman Webster, for calling this hearing on a topic of great importance: icebreaking capabilities.
Passing the Clean Water Act of 2023, a bill I introduced in partnership with Ranking Member Napolitano, would restore the historic, bipartisan protections that the Sackett decision removed.
I will note that recipients of the Medal of Honor have performed great acts of bravery in service to the United States. This bill is one way to honor the servicemembers. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I…
Local governments and electrical co-ops should not be penalized for taking out loans to jump- start disaster recovery for their communities. This bill will direct the administrator of FEMA to reimburse qualifying interest accrued on such…





