Political Quotes

On the recordJune 13, 2013
I'd encourage our colleagues to vote ``no'' on this amendment. The amendment implies that the President is negotiating some secret deal with Russia that would weaken U.S. security for the ideological pursuit of nuclear weapons reductions. Now, we know the President has the constitutional power to conduct formulations, and Congress has the authority to provide advice and consent to ratification and to deny funding for any implementation of any treaty. The administration has provided regular briefings and has supplied senior State and Defense officials over here to our committee and to the House Foreign Affairs Committee and informed us on talks on Russia. This amendment also is not necessary. The bill already contains numerous provisions asking for information on U.S.-Russian missile defense cooperation and blocking nuclear weapons reductions. So I'd ask my colleagues to oppose this amendment. I reserve the balance of my time.
Said by
Rick Larsen
Democratic · Washington

Share

More from Rick Larsen

Sep 23, 2024

We have to make sure the FAA has the resources and tools it needs to effectively conduct its investigation.

congress.gov
Sep 10, 2024

Passing the Clean Water Act of 2023, a bill I introduced in partnership with Ranking Member Napolitano, would restore the historic, bipartisan protections that the Sackett decision removed.

congress.gov
Jul 23, 2024

This DOT, under the leadership of Secretary Buttigieg, is implementing policies to make our transportation systems cleaner, greener, safer and more accessible.

congress.gov
Jul 23, 2024

Everyone is for roadway safety--I don't question that at all--but it does seem you are making somewhat of a case, if we just leave it to formula grants only, there is no guarantee investment will be made in roadway safety as opposed to if…

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation