I found that to be one of the most ludicrous arguments that was being made, because are they saying that by overturning Roe v. Wade, that somehow we're going to have a more cordial discussion around this? That somehow this is going to bring the country together? That I thought was a really disingenuous statement from Alito.
Pramila Jayapal: “I found that to be one of the most ludicrous arguments that was being made, because are they saying that by overturning…”
Editor's note · Context
Jayapal criticizes the argument that overturning Roe v. Wade will lead to a more united discussion on the issue.
Share
More from Pramila Jayapal
The interventions conducted under the banner of the ‘Donroe Doctrine' appear to follow a partisan playbook: the endorsement of favored candidates, the placement of political allies, the weaponization of tariffs and sanctions, and, where…
We have to stop the constant, nonconsensual state of surveillance that we live in, and that starts with placing a moratorium on our government’s use of facial recognition technology.
We need a foreign policy based on partnership, exchange, and mutual respect.
Before this year's Panamerican Congress, I'm demanding the Trump administration answer for their 'Donroe' Doctrine.





