I think we would all agree, especially in a time of war, that nothing is more important than the safety of our men and women in uniform. And nothing should be more important to our military commanders at the Pentagon. But I come to the floor this morning because safety was not the priority when the military awarded the contract to build the next generation of refueling tankers. If that decision stands, if the contract goes to the European company Airbus, instead of Boeing, our servicemembers will be flying in planes that they and the military know are less safe. That has me very concerned. During the tanker competition, the Pentagon considered numerous factors, including survivability; that is, the ability to protect war fighters when they are in harm's way. But even though they found the Boeing tanker was much safer, the Pentagon chose the Airbus tanker anyway. Awarding a contract for a plane that is less safe makes zero sense to me. Why on Earth would our military choose a tanker that rated lower in safety and in survivability. That is the question I have come to the floor this morning to ask.
Patty Murray: “I think we would all agree, especially in a time of war, that nothing is more important than the safety of our men and…”
On the recordMay 7, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns over the safety of military refueling tankers during a Senate floor speech.
Share
More from Patty Murray
Jul 20, 2026
As long as this former preschool teacher is a United States senator, every one of those bills is dead on arrival.
Aug 4, 2026
This bill includes important extensions and language that House Republicans' CR did not, and it rejects Trump's frivolous war spending wish list.
Jul 17, 2026
Roger Rogoff is eminently qualified — throughout his career, he has demonstrated an outstanding commitment to public service, and he was appointed legally by the federal judges in the Western District of Washington.
Jul 31, 2026
My amendment is very simple — it asks one thing: Tell Congress and the public what these interagency agreements actually cost taxpayers.





