I find those arguments very offensive because, as taxpayers in this country, we provide dollars for many facilities across this country. But we have singled out women who are overseas serving us in countries overseas, and have told them that they cannot use their own private dollars to pay for a medical service in those facilities. We pay for many other services in those facilities, but we will not provide an abortion for those women. Yet, the Senator is absolutely correct; she will have to fly back to this country in a military plane paid for by taxpayer dollars. She will eat meals on that plane paid for by taxpayer dollars. All of us use taxpayer dollars when we travel on the roads, when we use our public schools, when we go to our colleges, when we have the police come to our house, or when we have a firetruck come to the House. Why are we singling out women who need a medical procedure and expanding the use of taxpayers' funds in that terminology? I find that very offensive.
Patty Murray: “I find those arguments very offensive because, as taxpayers in this country, we provide dollars for many facilities…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the use of taxpayer funds for military facilities and abortion services for women serving overseas.
Share
More from Patty Murray
The Trump administration is attempting a transparent end run around the Constitution and Congress by appointing Pete Serrano to a position he is not qualified to hold after the Eastern District declined to extend his tenure as U.S…
This administration doesn’t want to deal with advice and consent—they just want to install cronies to carry out a corrupt political agenda.
It’s good that we were able to produce a much-improved CR to keep the government funded and avert a shutdown that no one wants.
As long as this former preschool teacher is a United States senator, every one of those bills is dead on arrival.





