let's be very clear. The amendment that has been offered by Senator Vitter is an attack on the health and well-being of all Americans, purely and simply. When you look at the depth and breadth of this amendment which has been offered, it could withhold critical Federal dollars from virtually any health care entity or provider across the country that is in any way tied to abortion services, directly or indirectly. I wish to remind my colleagues that in some of our rural communities, there is only one health care provider. That clinic may provide flu shots for children, for the elderly, and it may also provide family planning services. This amendment which has been offered would tie that clinic's hands and prevent it from receiving any Federal funds whatsoever. That is just plain wrong. Our Nation's core health care providers rely on millions of dollars from Medicaid, from family planning, from community health centers, child health, and numerous programs which provide, as we all know, vital health care services to some of our Nation's most vulnerable women, men, and children. But because of the way this amendment is worded, it would put millions of men and women--primarily, of course, those who are low income who can't advocate for themselves, who don't have health insurance--at risk of losing access to family planning and other preventive health care services. We have all said many times we all want to reduce the number of abortions.…
Patty Murray: “let's be very clear. The amendment that has been offered by Senator Vitter is an attack on the health and well-being of…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment that would restrict federal funding for health care providers related to abortion services.
Share
More from Patty Murray
The Trump administration is attempting a transparent end run around the Constitution and Congress by appointing Pete Serrano to a position he is not qualified to hold after the Eastern District declined to extend his tenure as U.S…
This bill includes important extensions and language that House Republicans' CR did not, and it rejects Trump's frivolous war spending wish list.
Your child’s safety should not depend on their zip code. That has been the entire point of Head Start since 1965.
Republicans are not pro-family and they won’t lift a finger to help families get IVF—the Texas Republican Party just recently made banning IVF a part of their official party platform," said Murray.





