I deeply resent, I deeply resent those who would use our troops as leverage, those who would use our troops as hostages in order to extract from this Congress an agreement to spend $87 billion in Iraq. All of us support our troops, but this President and this leadership will not allow us to have separate votes on the money to support our troops and the money to build Iraq and money that could and probably will be used in a non-bid contracting-kind of environment. But it really offends me to imply that because we do not want to just give the President $87 billion to spend basically as he wants to spend it, that somehow we are not being supportive of our troops. I find that a painful thing to have to cope with.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the funding for troops and reconstruction in Iraq during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Marilyn Strickland
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Indiana will be postponed. {time} 0930 Amendment No. 64 Offered by Mr. Roy The Acting CHAIR…
Thank you, Chairman Webster. Thank you, Rear Admiral Phillips. And thank you, Mr. Maffei, for your incredible testimony today and answering our questions.
I look forward to strengthening this Federal partnership and making sure that when we put these dollars to use in communities that they are doing exactly what they intended.
My home State of Washington has been a long-time supporter and investor in intercity passenger rail.





