I am pleased that the substitute offered in committee helps to ensure that cleanup activities at the three uranium enrichment sites in our country do not suffer a setback as we increase funding available for the thorium processing site under title X of the Energy Policy Act of 1992. There is no doubt that all of these sites need to be cleaned up and these activities do not come cheaply. It is important that we clean up the thorium processing site in West Chicago, Illinois; and I completely understand the Speaker's desire to ensure Federal funds are available to do so. However, because the funds to clean up the thorium site come from the Uranium Decommissioning and Decontamination Fund, it is important to me and my friends from Kentucky and Tennessee that the reimbursement for cleanup of the Illinois site does not shift funds from the cleanup activities at the three uranium enrichment sites. It is also important that the burden for cleaning up the thorium site does not fall on nuclear-powered ratepayers.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for cleanup activities at uranium enrichment and thorium processing sites.
Share
More from Marilyn Strickland
But I think solving the problem means coming up with a dollar amount and not being afraid to say it is a lot of money.
House Republicans have made it clear that they do not support liberty, justice, and equal protection under the law for all. Last week, the majority passed an extremist defense bill that bans gender-affirming and reproductive care for…
My home State of Washington has been a long-time supporter and investor in intercity passenger rail.
If we were to bring our barracks up to what I call safe, habitable, something that doesn't look run-down or uninhabitable like we saw on these slides, what would the price tag be for that?





