In spite of all that has gone wrong, even today it seems as if military decisions are being affected by political considerations. Now, I understand what a serious charge that is, that military decisions would be affected or mandated or influenced by political considerations. But why would we allow these no-go zones in Iraq to remain no-go zones when we know that that cannot continue, that we have got to change that situation before the end of January, if in fact the Iraqi elections take place as planned, and the administration insists that they will take place? That means that at some period of time between now and the elections in Iraq in January we are going to have to deal with these no-go zones. And if it is true, and I believe it is, that as each day passes the insurgents who are occupying these areas increase their strength, increase their ability to resist our Armed Forces or the Iraqi forces once they do go into those areas, then it leads me to the only conclusion that I think is rational or logical, and that is that military decisions are being influenced by political considerations, namely the November 2 election in this country, and that is terribly troubling.
On the recordSeptember 22, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the influence of political considerations on military decisions regarding no-go zones in Iraq.
Share
More from Marilyn Strickland
Mar 22, 2023
Thank you, Chairman Webster. Thank you, Rear Admiral Phillips. And thank you, Mr. Maffei, for your incredible testimony today and answering our questions.
Sep 17, 2024
I thank Ranking Member Takano for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of my bill, H.R. 2911, the Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2024. I first thank Chairmen Bost and Luttrell and Ranking Members Takano and…
Mar 27, 2023
Building in America, having my hometown, my friends and neighbors build things, is not only important for our progress, our economy, our hope, our future, it is a big deal.





