the fact is, at the time he used those weapons we were cooperating with him. The first Bush administration was cooperating with him. He was a part of our team, so to speak, because we felt it was best if Iraq would be able to prevail over Iran at the time. And then to think that, 10 or 12 years later, there is no evidence that I know of or that the administration has brought forth to show that Saddam Hussein used chemical weapons following that incident some 12 or so years ago. And then to come back after a decade and use that as an excuse to launch a preemptive war simply does not make sense. When Saddam Hussein used these chemical weapons against his own people, our government was silent. We knew it was happening, and we were silent. And then for these self-righteous statements to be made a decade later does not make sense.
On the recordFebruary 11, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing U.S. policy and actions regarding Iraq and chemical weapons.
Share
More from Marilyn Strickland
Jan 30, 2024
One of the issues I've heard is that one of the major drivers of food insecurity is lack of access.
Apr 7, 2025
I thank Representative Takano for yielding time. Mr. Speaker, I rise to express my support for my bill, H.R. 970, the Fairness for Servicemembers and their Families Act of 2025. I first thank Chairmen Bost and Luttrell and Ranking Members…
Jan 30, 2024
Excluding BAH makes a member appear artificially impoverished and diminishes the value of a member's hard-earned military compensation and the value of the member's military service.
Sep 26, 2023
But I think solving the problem means coming up with a dollar amount and not being afraid to say it is a lot of money.





