Section 8105 of this bill authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to ``provide free of charge to Indian tribes any trees, portions of trees or forest products from National Forest Service land for traditional and cultural purposes as long as those products are not used for commercial purposes.'' Several Indian tribes in Washington State are successors in interest to tribes and bands who were signatory to treaties with the United States which expressly reserved the right to gather forest products from lands which currently include National Forest System lands. These treaties are regarded as the supreme law of the land and cannot be modified by Congress unless Congress clearly intends to do so. Am I correct that section 8105 is not in any way intended to modify or supersede the treaty rights of these tribes?
Maria Cantwell: “Section 8105 of this bill authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to ``provide free of charge to Indian tribes any…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of Section 8105 of a bill regarding Indian tribes' rights to gather forest products.
Share
More from Maria Cantwell
I think that the arms race that exists now where people are just paying any amount of money from a system is not the right way to get this done.
At a moment when climate change is intensifying wildfire risks, this administration is moving to strip protections from some of America’s last remaining wild forests.
The IRS’s address sharing policy therefore violates the statute, improperly displaces Congress’s legislative judgments, undermines the confidentiality of taxpayer information and taxpayer reliance, and threatens the national fisc.
We urge CMS to withdraw this rule to ensure that Medicaid can continue its mission of providing health coverage to low-income Americans.





