Maria Cantwell actually said...

I want to ask you about why NOAA didn't consider long-term costs as part of, you know, the indirect and long-term cost of such a facility?

So, it sounds as if you've reached a conclusion and it sounds like you are moving ahead.

Of course, they're trying to say that it's cheaper to operate in Oregon, ignoring the long-term costs that you have clearly stated in the RF...

the Agency has basically twisted the definition of capital investment, basically to evade oversight.