Kim Schrier: “I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment…”

“I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from Washington will be postponed. The Chair understands that amendment No. 194 will not be offered. Vacating Demand for Recorded Vote on Amendments En Bloc No. 5 Offered by Ms. McCollum =========================== NOTE =========================== June 20, 2019, on page H4977, the following appeared: VACATING DEMAND FOR RECORDED VOTE ON AMENDMENTS EN BLOC OFFERED BY MS. MCCOLLUM The online version has been corrected to read: VACATING DEMAND FOR RECORDED VOTE ON AMENDMENTS EN BLOC NO. 5 OFFERED BY MS. MCCOLLUM ========================= END NOTE ========================= Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chair, I ask unanimous consent that the request for a recorded vote on amendments en bloc No. 5 offered by the gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. McCollum) be withdrawn to the end that the question be put de novo. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will redesignate the amendments en bloc. The Clerk redesignated the amendments en bloc. The Acting CHAIR. Is there objection to the request of the gentlewoman from Minnesota? There was no objection. The Acting CHAIR. The request for a recorded vote is withdrawn. The question is on the amendments en bloc offered by the gentlewoman from Minnesota (Ms. McCollum). The en bloc amendments were agreed to. Ms. McCOLLUM. Mr. Chair, I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR.…”