Well, the gentlewoman is correct. It was 100 to zero, unanimous, in the Senate; yet we still have not had a chance to vote on a security bill. And that is incredible, because if this bill was brought to the floor, we are confident it would pass with overwhelming bipartisan support. This bill has bipartisan support, the gentleman from Connecticut (Mr. Shays), the gentlewoman from Maryland (Mrs. Morella), who is a leader on this subject, has supported this concept. We will pass this bill with bipartisan support. The problem is that, unfortunately, some of the leadership in this Chamber, in the majority party, does not want this bill and the potential federalization of this issue to occur, to even have a vote on it. And I think that is most unfortunate because we would pass this bill if we had a chance to do it. I have to tell my colleagues that the people I talk to want to see the Federal Government assure the flying public that they have security.
Jay Inslee: “Well, the gentlewoman is correct. It was 100 to zero, unanimous, in the Senate; yet we still have not had a chance to…”
On the recordOctober 16, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a security bill and bipartisan support during a floor speech.
Share
More from Jay Inslee
Jan 19, 2022
We're now at about 80 percent. This is pivotal because 80 percent of the people that are in our hospitals are the unvaccinated.
Jan 19, 2022
There has been a profoundly different approach to this whole pandemic, you know, based on whether you're red or blue.
Jul 1, 2022
I do think that`s an important aspect to not allow the databases which are extensive, as we know the federal government to be used by the prosecutors or investigators of the states that want to take this right away from women.
Jan 19, 2022
We need the Republican Party to take some responsibility here and not put their Members, who are spreading this dangerous filth, to America.





