Mr. Speaker, it pains me to rise in opposition to the valedictory measure of the gentleman from Hawaii, but there's no blinking at the fact that this bill strikes at the very foundation of a Nation that's dedicated to the concept of equality under law. It establishes a different set of laws, a different set of rights, and a different government for one group of Americans based solely upon their race. Two American families living next door to each other would be afforded two different sets of rights enforced by two separate sovereignties all based entirely upon accident of birth. Ever since Brown v. Board of Education buried the 'separate but equal' doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled that such an arrangement is fundamentally incompatible with the American Constitution. Ten years ago in the case of Rice v. Cayetano, the Supreme Court, in a 7-2 decision, struck down identical race-based voting qualifications for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker opposes a bill that he believes undermines equality under the law by establishing race-based rights.
Share
More from Doc Hastings
I thank the ranking member for yielding to me in support of this measure that I think is most deserving for my dear friend from Florida.
In light of the process questions that the gentleman asked about hearings, I am proud of our Democratic majority's record when it comes to regular order. At the beginning of this Congress, we instituted a rule to require hearings and…
In the wake of the Deepwater Horizon accident it became apparent that the structure of the regulatory agency charged with oversight of offshore energy production was inadequate. While the Department of the Interior has reorganized their…
When I asked the gentleman to speak, I didn't mean for him to take my time. I yield an additional 15 seconds to the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Raskin) for closing purposes.





