Mr. Speaker, this is a day that each of us hoped would never come, and we pray that it will not come again. Simply put, there is absolutely no satisfaction in judging one of our own. But the Constitution makes clear that we are the only ones who can judge a fellow Member of Congress in cases such as Mr. Traficant. It is certainly difficult for me, as I am sure it is difficult for my fellow members of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, to recommend the expulsion of a colleague. Our recommendation in this matter is based solely on the facts as we know and understand them. This recommendation is one that I know the entire committee took very seriously. My only responsibilities in this matter were twofold. First, I served as chairman of the Investigative Subcommittee. Along with 3 of my colleagues, our responsibility was to examine the evidence from Mr. Traficant's trial in Cleveland, Ohio, and to determine whether there was 'substantial reason to believe' that violations of the House rules occurred.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the expulsion of a fellow member of Congress during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Doc Hastings
On Wednesday, the Rules Committee met for 7\1/2\ hours and reported a rule, House Resolution 1017, providing for consideration of six measures, each under a closed rule. For H.R. 51, the rule provides 1 hour of debate equally divided and…
On Tuesday, the Rules Committee met and reported a rule, House Resolution 650, providing for consideration of H.R. 4617, the Stopping Harmful Interference in Elections for a Lasting Democracy, better known as the SHIELD Act, under a…
Yesterday, before we began our proceedings in the Rules Committee, I asked one of my good friends if he would speak on this rule. It is for the reason that I consider him one of the preeminent constitutional scholars in this institution…
Through you, I would advise my friend that I have no further speakers, and I am prepared to close if he is.





