Mr. Speaker, for over 2 years I served on the investigative committee that reviewed allegations and evidence involving Mr. Rangel, and we found substantial reason to believe, which is what our threshold was, that violations occurred. Because the facts of this matter are not disputed, I will not comment on the evidence. But I will, however, comment on the length of the investigation and particularly a statement made by Mr. Rangel regarding the confidential work of the investigative committee. First, on the length of the investigation. Chairman Green and I, when I was the ranking member of the subcommittee, had every intention of completing the investigation before the conclusion of the 110th Congress, but events intervened. In September 2008, Mr. Rangel publicly pledged that he would release in a timely manner a forensic analysis of 20 years of his tax returns and financial disclosures. However, we did not receive the report until May of 2009, 8 months later. Then, in December 2008, serious new allegations involving Nabors Industries resulted in the committee's unanimous decision to expand its jurisdiction.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the investigation into allegations against Mr. Rangel and the delays in the process.
Share
More from Doc Hastings
And I thank the distinguished chairman, my good friend, for yielding me the customary 30 minutes. (Mr. HASTINGS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
Through you, I would advise my good friend from Arizona that I have no further speakers and I am prepared to close whenever she is.
Would you be good enough to tell both sides how much time we have remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Florida has 11\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from Georgia has 8\1/2\ minutes remaining.
By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 1017 and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: ____________________





