I appreciate that. I simply want to say that these are issues that I know are unique to mainly the Western part of the United States. But in many respects, the gentleman made a statement that really supports my amendment. Because he said the American taxpayers are spending billions of dollars on salmon recovery. That is true. So are the ratepayers in the Bonneville power system. They are paying billions of dollars for salmon recovery. The good news is the fish runs in the last 5 years have come back in record numbers. To be very honest with you, these guidelines haven't been imposed, and the salmon are coming back. So why would you want to impose these buffer zones when it probably wouldn't add anything, and when a Federal court has said it is questionable science anyway.
Share
More from Doc Hastings
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX, this 15- minute vote on adoption of the resolution will be followed by a 5- minute vote on the motion to suspend…
It is with profound sadness that I rise today with my colleagues who have helped organize this, particularly my colleague Congressman Rutherford, to pay tribute to the servicemembers who tragically perished on December 5 during a training…
I have an amendment to H.R. 1, the For the People Act of 2019, that I have offered with my good friend from my neighboring district, Congressman Ted Deutch. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the…
On Monday the Rules Committee met and reported a rule, House Resolution 548, providing for consideration of H.R. 205, Protecting and Securing Florida's Coastline Act of 2019; H.R. 1146, the Arctic Cultural and Coastal Plain Protection Act…





