I understand why my good friend from Nevada is offering this; he's representing what he thinks is right for his constituents, and I commend him for that. But the fact of the matter is this is the law of the country, this is the repository, period; yet the Department of Energy, in my view, has been operating outside the law for the last year. Ratepayers have already spent $10 billion on this. If we terminate this site, we will have other liabilities--in fact, there are already contractual liabilities of $2 billion that have been let already--plus the expense, if we have to find another repository, will cost taxpayers further billions of dollars. So I understand why the gentleman is doing this, I think he is incorrect, and I urge that Members vote against his amendment.
Doc Hastings: “I understand why my good friend from Nevada is offering this; he's representing what he thinks is right for his…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is addressing concerns about the Department of Energy's operations and the financial implications of terminating a waste repository site.
Share
More from Doc Hastings
I would advise the gentleman that I have no further speakers, and I too am prepared to close.
Through you, I would advise my friend that I have no further speakers, and I am prepared to close if he is.
Through you, I would advise my good friend from Arizona that I have no further speakers and I am prepared to close whenever she is.
I would ask my friend Mr. Davis if he would stand by just a minute. I have a query of him. Last night in the Rules Committee, our colleague Ed Perlmutter offered the gentleman an opportunity to come today to ask Mr. Zuckerberg the…





