Mr. Speaker, I am disappointed that Democrat leaders have decided not to allow the House to vote on my amendment to improve the proposed Cobell Indian settlement, a settlement that benefits individual Indians across the country. The amendment I offered was simple and addressed improvements requested of Congress by individual Indians, tribal leaders, and an association of more than 50 federally recognized tribes in the Northwest. Mr. Speaker, I want to make it very clear, a settlement on this issue is long overdue, but the agreement negotiated by the Obama administration and the plaintiffs' lawyers can be improved by Congress to benefit individual Indians. And let me explain why. While most of the Indians will get between a $500 and a $1,000 check, the lead plaintiff could receive $15 million or more as an incentive award. A handful of lawyers could be paid over $100 million, which is almost one-third of the value of the claims that they litigated.
On the recordMay 28, 2010
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about the Cobell Indian settlement and the distribution of funds.
Share
More from Doc Hastings
Dec 20, 2018
I was not present for rollcall No. 448, S. 756--the First Step Act of 2018. However, had I been present, I would have voted ``yes'' on the measure. ____________________
Oct 23, 2019
Through you, I would advise my friend that I have no further speakers, and I am prepared to close if he is.
Jun 25, 2020
On Wednesday, the Rules Committee met for 7\1/2\ hours and reported a rule, House Resolution 1017, providing for consideration of six measures, each under a closed rule. For H.R. 51, the rule provides 1 hour of debate equally divided and…
Jun 25, 2020
I would advise the gentleman that I have no further speakers, and I too am prepared to close.





