Mr. Speaker, that the issue here is not the benefits of these settlements. We think those settlements are good. The one element that we have a question on is what is the cost to the taxpayer? I think that is a very, very legitimate issue for us in the U.S. House to consider. So with that reason, as I mentioned earlier, I have to reluctantly oppose all three of these bills. And I would hope in the future at the committee level we can have this full transparency on future settlements that we will inevitably have in this Congress. With that, Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Doc Hastings: “Mr. Speaker, that the issue here is not the benefits of these settlements. We think those settlements are good. The one…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about the cost to taxpayers regarding certain settlement bills.
Share
More from Doc Hastings
For the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Woodall), my friend, pending which I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, none of us know what the future holds, but my…
I would ask my friend Mr. Davis if he would stand by just a minute. I have a query of him. Last night in the Rules Committee, our colleague Ed Perlmutter offered the gentleman an opportunity to come today to ask Mr. Zuckerberg the…
I would advise the gentleman that I have no further speakers, and I too am prepared to close.
By direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 1017 and ask for its immediate consideration. The Clerk read the resolution, as follows: ____________________





