Transfer projects, maybe by definition because the O&M has been taken out of direct Federal spending, might be more cost-efficient
Doc Hastings: “Transfer projects, maybe by definition because the O&M has been taken out of direct Federal spending, might be more…”
Editor's note · Context
Hastings discusses the potential cost-efficiency of federally owned transfer projects.
Share
More from Doc Hastings
Through you, I would advise my good friend from Arizona that I have no further speakers and I am prepared to close whenever she is.
Through you, I would advise my friend that I have no further speakers, and I am prepared to close if he is.
In addition to those three hearings, the House Administration Committee held eight other election-related hearings this year. I also want to point out that while it isn't the primary committee of jurisdiction for this bill, the Judiciary…
I take notice that the Speaker pro tempore has changed, and I am very pleased that one of the leaders of the legislation that we are taking up today is now serving as Speaker pro tempore. Madam Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman…





