I want to thank the chairman for this opportunity to discuss a matter of great interest and importance to the Tri-Cities community in my district. In the 1940s and 1950s, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers acquired land along the shoreline of the Columbia River in Tri-Cities, Washington. The land, 34 miles of the McNary shoreline, is currently underutilized. The local communities continue to be saddled with hundreds of thousands of dollars of M&O costs annually for upkeep of land of these shoreline properties that they don't even own. I support the community proposal to convey the land back to the cities. I have been working with the chairman on proposed amendment language to do so but respect the fact the chairman has let me know there is still some work to be done. I continue to encourage further community engagement and believe public meetings are necessary to ensure all voices are heard, including that of the local Tribes. It is also a requirement that the city governments fully understand the responsibilities and potential costs that could arise from having this land conveyed. There must be further coordination between conveyance proponents, community stakeholders, city governments, and the Army Corps. Mr. Chairman, you have raised concerns about the language in its current form and have urged further efforts. I am committed to continuing to work with the local communities to address these concerns. Therefore, Mr.…
On the recordMay 23, 2018
Share
More from Dan Newhouse
Jul 8, 2026
The American story is rooted in ingenuity and perseverance of the people. From the agricultural heartland of the Yakima Valley to the innovation of the Tri-Cities, the Central Washington spirit of hard work and stewardship continues to…
Jan 22, 2026
Mr. Speaker, the fiscal year 2026 Homeland Security appropriations bill is the culmination of the hard work of our committee and our staff and provides critical investments to protect the American homeland. As a member of the Subcommittee…
Mar 31, 2025
I was unable to vote on roll call no. 84 and no. 85 due to unavoidable circumstances. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on Roll Call No. 84 and YEA on Roll Call No. 85. personal explanation





