I think what is important is we clarify what is being talked about. We have had the issue of conscience on this floor before from civil rights to war protesting. Choices are not being challenged here. Every woman still has a choice. But we take away the choice of the taxpayers when we make them pay for abortions. That is the issue: Should taxpayers subsidize abortions? The Supreme Court has said that government can distinguish amongst health care procedures, especially abortion because it is different. Other procedures protect life. Abortion terminates life. This bill does not challenge a woman's right to an abortion. It just says if she makes that choice, if I choose to terminate my child's life, that I have to pay for that and not those that do not agree with that choice pay for it.
Adam Smith: “I think what is important is we clarify what is being talked about. We have had the issue of conscience on this floor…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing taxpayer funding for abortions during a floor debate.
Share
More from Adam Smith
This expands it to any organization that is deemed to be engaging in fact-checking. Basically what this amendment has done--and it is in law from last year; now we are making it permanent and expanding it--is basically if you are an…
Mr. Chair, there are two aspects. One is a budget debate, and it is fascinating. We are having this passionate debate about $115 million, and we didn't, apparently, have that debate when we passed the budget resolution that the sponsor of…
This amendment would be very destructive to achieving peace in Ukraine. I agree with the gentlewoman; that should be the goal. What has been clear for quite some time is that Putin will only stop his war when it is clear that he cannot…
I think the most crucial point here is that the United States of America is the most economically powerful country in the history of the world. That has been the case since the end of World War II. A large part of that is because of our…





