I thank the Member from New York. Let me start by acknowledging two things: One, the Republican majority won the election and has the right to bring this rules package with changes to the floor. Number two, there are some good provisions in this. Mr. Walden just described several. But, three, there is a time bomb in this. The major responsibility that we have in Congress is to debate taxes and spending--taxes and spending. The provision that basically will protect privileged tax breaks so that we cannot have a debate about whether or not a hedge fund billionaire should pay at least the same rate of income tax as his or her chauffeur or cook; the fact we cannot have a debate as to whether mature and profitable industries should continue to get taxpayer subsidies, like the oil industry, instead of being able to divert them to emerging technologies; the fact that these are off the table so that the only outcome will be cuts in spending that affect every single person without any debate, that is the problem. And when Mr. McCarthy said that the rules dictate behavior, he left out that the rules dictate outcome as well.
On the recordJanuary 5, 2011
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about a rules package affecting tax and spending debates.
Share
More from Peter Welch
Jul 25, 2026
Building on generations of leadership in aviation, American companies are spearheading electric aircraft innovation.
Aug 8, 2025
Donald Trump has made it his personal mission to limit transparency and accountability, and the State Department’s upcoming human rights report — or what remains of it — will certainly reflect that.
Jul 31, 2025
As a result, we are deeply concerned that you may have failed to alert your personnel — or investors — of the immense legal risks they face for conducting what amounts to military operations on behalf of the Israeli government on land…





