I would much prefer a statute because, as the distinguished Senator from Illinois and the distinguished Senator from West Virginia know, a statute could be easily changed. It could easily be repealed, if we are wrong. In fact, if the Senator from Illinois will bear with me, I want to follow up on what he was saying. As an old printer's son, I made sure we had the same typeface on both sides of this chart. On the left side is the Bill of Rights; on the right side is the proposed constitutional amendment. Here is the Bill of Rights, all 10, and here is the constitutional amendment. They are just about the same length.
Patrick Leahy: “I would much prefer a statute because, as the distinguished Senator from Illinois and the distinguished Senator from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the preference for a statute over a constitutional amendment.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
Many hoped that President Giammattei would reject the corruption and impunity that his predecessors institutionalized. The reappointment of Attorney General Porras, who according to the State Department has ``repeatedly obstructed and…
Do not turn your material, do not turn your reports over to the Executive Branch and let them tell you what is or is not classified.
Congress was the original classification authority (OCA). It let that power essentially slip away to the Executive Branch.
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.





