Let me ask the distinguished majority leader, is it not a fact that these public, spirited telephone company owners are threatening to turn off wiretaps, according to the press accounts, that have been legally ordered through search warrants because the U.S. Government has failed to pay them millions of dollars, and does not pay them the millions of dollars? I just wonder if any of the legislation we are talking about might be mandating our own Government to pay the bills for the wiretaps. I ask that only because it seems this public spiritedness goes one way if they want to be immunized or the administration wants to be immunized from anybody asking them questions, but it goes a different way if it comes down to the question of getting paid.
Patrick Leahy: “Let me ask the distinguished majority leader, is it not a fact that these public, spirited telephone company owners are…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of wiretap funding and legal obligations during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
On February 23rd of this year, Senators Schumer and Coburn and I wrote you a letter commending your decision to sever ties with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR.
If we can't clearly and unequivocally condemn the actions of white supremacists, or simply acknowledge the January 6, 2021, attack on our Capitol for what it was, an insurrection, we fan the flames of hatred and violence.
Many hoped that President Giammattei would reject the corruption and impunity that his predecessors institutionalized. The reappointment of Attorney General Porras, who according to the State Department has ``repeatedly obstructed and…





