the Senate began debate on unfunded mandates with the premise that the Federal Government should not indiscriminately force State and local governments to implement Federal statutes. With this premise, S. 1 goes to the heart of the way Government works in the United States. It seeks to change the balance between the Federal and State governments. I happen to agree with the premise and welcome a discussion about the balance of Government. I agree that the distant reach of Federal Government should not tell States how to take care of the special needs of their communities. I have been working for months to get the Federal Government to condone a dairy compact that several New England States have chosen for themselves. I also agree that local problems are best solved by local solutions. Again in Vermont, we worked to find flexibility in Federal statutes to deal with a superfund site, inspection and maintenance standards for Clean Air Act provisions, and other Federal laws. I believe it is not fair for Congress to make the rules and force state legislatures to levy the taxes to pay for them.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the balance of power between Federal and State governments regarding unfunded mandates.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
throughout my 48 years in the Senate, I worked to uphold the American tradition of a humane immigration policy and fought to advance comprehensive immigration reform. As an advocate for refugees and asylum seekers fleeing violence and…
I understand the floor vote is going to be soon. I ask unanimous consent that it be after I finish my remarks. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
I have spent more than 30 years working to build closer relations with Vietnam, a country where 58,220 Americans and an estimated 3 million Vietnamese died in a war that never should have been fought. In 1975, as the newest member of the…





