I rise in support of the National Environmental Technology Act of 1994 which I have cosponsored. I feel strongly that this bill provides support to an up-and-coming industry in Vermont, and one of the most important industries in our Nation. Small businesses need guidance and support to tap the environmental technology market, and Americans need good-paying jobs. These are concerns that we have today, and they are addressed in S. 978. The visionary strength of S. 978 is that it also takes care of our concerns for tomorrow. The Environmental Technology Act promotes economic vitality in a way that will make the world a better place for our children. Ultimately, this is the goal we have to keep our eye on. Many special interests court the idea that environmental stewardship chokes off economic prosperity. Most Vermonters know that the opposite is true--environmental degradation is the millstone that brings on economic decline. The Environmental Technology Act is clear recognition that economic prosperity and environmental conservation go hand in hand. I believe that this is the direction in which Vermont and the country must go.
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the National Environmental Technology Act of 1994 during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
in 1986, when much of Central America was embroiled in armed conflicts in which hundreds of thousands of people, overwhelmingly civilians, were killed, a group of parishioners from the Franconia, NH, Congregational Church established…
I understand the floor vote is going to be soon. I ask unanimous consent that it be after I finish my remarks. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
the 11th of December marked the 6-month anniversary of the violent death of widely respected Palestinian- American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh. On May 19, I echoed Secretary of State Blinken's call for an ``independent, credible…
the Johnson amendment asks us to cede the power of the purse to public servants in the executive branch who are unaccountable to the voters. These public servants, dedicated though they may be, cannot possibly share the depth of knowledge…





