It is hard to think of a time when you find the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Washington Times all agreeing on an issue. But this is, as I said before, not an issue of political ideology, it is an issue of simple justice. It is an issue that reflect what is best in this country, what is the best in us as Americans. In fact, it would be hard to think of a better example of how unworkable this provision is--the one in the bill that we seek to correct--than a woman who joined me at a press conference yesterday. Two years ago, she fled Peru. She had been horribly treated and threatened by rebel guerrillas there. She came to this country without proper documents. She was able to convince an immigration judge after an opportunity for a fair hearing that she would suffer persecution if she returned home. Yesterday, I asked her to tell about her experience. Less than two sentences into her story, as the memories of what she had put up with 2 years ago played back, she broke down crying.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the emotional impact of immigration provisions in a bill.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
People in the Trump administration who know nothing and care less about these programs are arbitrarily jeopardizing relations with a strategic partner in one of the most challenging regions of the world.
the Johnson amendment asks us to cede the power of the purse to public servants in the executive branch who are unaccountable to the voters. These public servants, dedicated though they may be, cannot possibly share the depth of knowledge…
the most important technology connections are ones between people. Vermont is a place where people connecting is not only important to life, but is the very fabric of it. It was natural, I think, for me to see cyberspace as a continuation…
Do not turn your material, do not turn your reports over to the Executive Branch and let them tell you what is or is not classified.





