I believe the House has named a number of Judiciary Committee members to their conference. Yet, we do not have anybody from the Judiciary Committee here. There are significant antitrust issues. There are significant consumer issues. There are significant competitive issues, all of which have been looked at, explored and discussed by the Judiciary Committee. Yet, Senate Judiciary members will have no input in the conference, and we all know the bill is going to be written in conference. When we remove competitive incentives, we all know what happens. Take a look at the cable industry.
Patrick Leahy: “I believe the House has named a number of Judiciary Committee members to their conference. Yet, we do not have anybody…”
On the recordOctober 13, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of Judiciary Committee representation in a legislative conference on antitrust issues.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
Mar 22, 2023
Do not turn your material, do not turn your reports over to the Executive Branch and let them tell you what is or is not classified.
May 25, 2022
Many hoped that President Giammattei would reject the corruption and impunity that his predecessors institutionalized. The reappointment of Attorney General Porras, who according to the State Department has ``repeatedly obstructed and…
Apr 21, 2023
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.





