it is true that this amendment by itself would save money. But you could also say that if we had an amendment that totally did away with the food stamp program that would save even more money. Basically what this says is you could be somebody who has worked in the plant for 15 years, you paid your taxes, you are an upright citizen who paid for the programs and everything else, and if that factory, the largest employer in the area, should suddenly close, and you cannot find a job within 30 or 31 days later and if you are looking for food stamps you are not going to get them because you have not worked in the last 30 days. This is far too punitive. It is going to make it extremely difficult, as the senior Senator from Indiana said, for those who have been employed who because of a disaster or a plant closing or something else are out of a job. It goes much too far.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the punitive nature of a food stamp work amendment during Senate debate.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
today marks the 1-year anniversary of the election of Xiomara Castro Sarmiento, the first woman to hold the office of President of Honduras. She succeeded Juan Orlando Hernandez who had discredited the office of the Presidency by colluding…
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.
I have spent more than 30 years working to build closer relations with Vietnam, a country where 58,220 Americans and an estimated 3 million Vietnamese died in a war that never should have been fought. In 1975, as the newest member of the…
listening to Senator Wyden and Senator Brown about Social Security, I would tell my colleagues that the first recipient of Social Security was a Vermonter. And Vermonters at that time, I believe, were the most Republican State in the…





