I wonder if you might consider this: have a vote on your amendment, and have a vote on my amendment separately, and let the Senate work its will. I will say this very frankly. I think the reason nobody moved to strike my amendment out of the appropriations bill was that--I heard this from both sides--they said: OK, we understand this is not a bad amendment, and we don't want to be on record as saying we are against it. I think the obvious embarrassment by some, not all, but the obvious embarrassment by some who had to vote against it on the other side was they wished they had not. They wished they could have kept it in. So I would ask my dear friend from Virginia--and he is truly my dear friend--what do you think of that idea? Let's vote on both of them?
Patrick Leahy: “I wonder if you might consider this: have a vote on your amendment, and have a vote on my amendment separately, and let…”
On the recordJune 16, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Proposing a separate vote on his and another senator's amendments during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
May 24, 2022
If we can't clearly and unequivocally condemn the actions of white supremacists, or simply acknowledge the January 6, 2021, attack on our Capitol for what it was, an insurrection, we fan the flames of hatred and violence.
Apr 21, 2023
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.
Mar 22, 2023
Congress was the original classification authority (OCA). It let that power essentially slip away to the Executive Branch.





