The irony is that those who are holding up family planning money, claiming they are doing it because of their opposition to abortion, are assuring that there will be more abortions in the countries we send the family planning money to. The family planning money, in so many of these countries, has provided a strong alternative to abortion, because many countries use abortion as a method of birth control. Our family planning money would cut down abortions. It has been proven. For the life of me, I cannot understand this topsy-turvy, ``Alice in Wonderland,'' view of cutting family planning money and saying we are trying to stop abortions, because its does nothing of the kind. In fact, when people have access to family planning, the abortions go down.
Patrick Leahy: “The irony is that those who are holding up family planning money, claiming they are doing it because of their opposition…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of family planning funding on abortion rates.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.
People in the Trump administration who know nothing and care less about these programs are arbitrarily jeopardizing relations with a strategic partner in one of the most challenging regions of the world.
On February 23rd of this year, Senators Schumer and Coburn and I wrote you a letter commending your decision to sever ties with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR.
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.





