This provision only applies in the situation where a State is requiring monthly reports from food stamp recipients. With monthly reporting, frequent certification should not be necessary and adequate safeguards should be in place to ensure the financial integrity of the Food Stamp Program. Certification can be a time consuming and burdensome process and should not be required where adequate safeguards are in place in the form of monthly reporting. We would expect the Secretary to very carefully scrutinize any request to shorten the certification period and to determine that a shorter period is both necessary and that it will correct a specific problem which cannot be solved through monthly reporting. I would add that the committee expects the Department of Agriculture to provide adequate assurance in regulations that the provisions relating to monthly reporting will not adversely affect the quality control error rates of the States as it relates to this provision. And of course, nothing in this bill should be construed as limiting a State's ability to reclaim overissued benefits or issue additional benefits for under issuances as determined by a monthly report. I would like to add that in reference to the term 'report' in this legislation, the term means a complete report.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions related to food stamp program reporting requirements.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.
I have been a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee for 48 years, since I was elected in 1974. I have helped to write nine farm bills, and I have overseen the creation of programs that have helped farmers, food systems, and consumers…
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.
the Johnson amendment asks us to cede the power of the purse to public servants in the executive branch who are unaccountable to the voters. These public servants, dedicated though they may be, cannot possibly share the depth of knowledge…





