I note that on page 16 of the supplemental appropriations bill, H.R. 4899, under the heading ``Afghanistan Security Forces Fund'' and on page 17 under the heading ``Iraq Security Forces Fund,'' which appropriate funds for training, equipment, and other assistance for these foreign security forces, there is language that makes these funds available ``notwithstanding any other provision of law.'' I would ask my friend, the chairman of the Appropriations Committee and of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, whether I am correct that this ``notwithstanding'' language is not intended to apply to the ``Leahy'' vetting procedures which are designed to ensure that foreign security forces that receive U.S. assistance have not been credibly alleged to have committed violations of human rights.
Patrick Leahy: “I note that on page 16 of the supplemental appropriations bill, H.R. 4899, under the heading ``Afghanistan Security…”
On the recordMay 26, 2010
Editor's note · Context
Leahy is discussing funding provisions related to foreign security forces in the supplemental appropriations bill.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
Feb 22, 2023
On February 23rd of this year, Senators Schumer and Coburn and I wrote you a letter commending your decision to sever ties with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR.
May 25, 2022
Many hoped that President Giammattei would reject the corruption and impunity that his predecessors institutionalized. The reappointment of Attorney General Porras, who according to the State Department has ``repeatedly obstructed and…
Apr 20, 2023
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.





