Ashcroft Is the Wrong Man for Justice John Ashcroft, the man who would be attorney general, is quite a deft backpedaler. Just a few weeks ago, he was a right-wing ideologue dedicated to banning abortion and fighting the civil-rights tide. Now he says he's eager to enforce the laws he hates. So which Ashcroft are we getting-- last year's true believer or a Bush-era compromiser? It's impossible to tell, and maybe it doesn't matter. Whether Ashcroft is an extremist in centrist garb or some sort of changeling, Americans have reason to worry. They needn't fret because of Ashcroft's conservative leanings; anyone President Bush sends to Justice is bound to lean that way. They should worry instead about Ashcroft's integrity. As last week's hearings evinced, he has less of it than his backers like to think. For starters, there's the small matter of the truth. Ashcroft isn't telling it. His declarations before the Senate contradict his record. Some of his equivocation is penny- ante--such as his claim that he'd never have spoken so fondly of proslavery confederate leaders to Southern Partisan magazine back in 1998 if he'd known the rag favored slaveholding itself.
On the recordFebruary 1, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over John Ashcroft's nomination as attorney general.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
Mar 22, 2023
Congress was the original classification authority (OCA). It let that power essentially slip away to the Executive Branch.
Jun 2, 2025
People in the Trump administration who know nothing and care less about these programs are arbitrarily jeopardizing relations with a strategic partner in one of the most challenging regions of the world.
Dec 22, 2022
I have been a member of the Senate Agriculture Committee for 48 years, since I was elected in 1974. I have helped to write nine farm bills, and I have overseen the creation of programs that have helped farmers, food systems, and consumers…





