I am glad to hear that nobody wants to delay Merrick Garland. I would only point out that his nomination first came before us in 1995, and he was voted out of committee, I believe unanimously, by Republicans and Democrats alike, in 1995. We are going to vote, I hope, very soon to confirm him. But if that is not delay, I would hate like heck to see what delay would be around here. He was nominated in 1995, got through the committee in 1995 and will finally get confirmed in 1997. I understand other members say they would be perfectly willing to help out on the district court; we need help. We have Judge Colleen Killar-Kotelly who is still waiting, nominated very early in 1996, has yet to come through, even though in 1996 alone the criminal case backlog increased by 37 percent. We talk about getting tough on criminals. We certainly will not send the judges that might do it.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination of Merrick Garland and judicial vacancies during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
a few minutes ago, before I opened the Senate, I had the privilege of walking on the floor with Senator-elect Peter Welch of Vermont. I am going to speak more about our new Senator, who will be taking this seat very shortly, within the…
I spoke on this matter earlier this week, and I still agree with the Senator from Florida that we have a responsibility to help Americans in the wake of disasters. It does not matter if you are a Republican or a Democrat, or if you are…
the 11th of December marked the 6-month anniversary of the violent death of widely respected Palestinian- American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh. On May 19, I echoed Secretary of State Blinken's call for an ``independent, credible…
listening to Senator Wyden and Senator Brown about Social Security, I would tell my colleagues that the first recipient of Social Security was a Vermonter. And Vermonters at that time, I believe, were the most Republican State in the…





