This is an inexplicable anomaly of the law that reflects a different era. Had they been assembling, for example, this oil rig, had they had it on land and it exploded, they would be able to recover as anybody could. If it was an onshore oil rig--of course, we have many in this country and throughout the world--if they had been working on that and there had been an explosion and they lost their lives, there would have been remedies available. But because it was at sea and even if it is just barely at sea, the remedies are entirely different. To put it in laymen's terms, they are basically limited to the value of what is left. Of course, there is nothing left.
Patrick Leahy: “This is an inexplicable anomaly of the law that reflects a different era. Had they been assembling, for example, this…”
Editor's note · Context
Leahy discusses legal remedies related to oil rig accidents at sea compared to those on land.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.
Do not turn your material, do not turn your reports over to the Executive Branch and let them tell you what is or is not classified.
If we can't clearly and unequivocally condemn the actions of white supremacists, or simply acknowledge the January 6, 2021, attack on our Capitol for what it was, an insurrection, we fan the flames of hatred and violence.
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.





