S. Con. Res. 5 expresses congressional opposition to a unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state and urges President Clinton to unequivocally assert United States opposition to such a declaration. I agree with the sponsors of this resolution that it would be extremely unwise for the Palestinian Authority to take such a provocative and destabilizing step. In open forums and behind closed doors the administration has expressed repeatedly its opposition to any unilateral action by either Palestinians or Israelis which would predetermine issues reserved for final status negotiations. There is no doubt that the United States firmly opposes a unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state. Such a declaration would be a violation of the principles contained in the Oslo Accords, and it could imperil the hard won but fragile agreement reached at Wye River. A unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state would throw the entire process into reverse. It would be a serious mistake. So I support S. Con. Res. 5 as far as it goes, Unfortunately, it does not reflect the inescapable fact that there are two sides to the Middle East Conflict.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing congressional resolution opposing a unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
veterans make a valuable addition to any workplace. Vermont companies know this, which is why most employers in the State do their best to recruit former servicemembers. But some go far beyond others in their commitment to employing…
I brought a lot of bills to the floor here. This will be the last one I bring to the floor of the Senate. But it is one that we have to act on quickly or we risk a government shutdown. This omnibus appropriations bill provides $1.7…
on behalf of Vermonters, today I was proud to vote for the final passage of the Respect for Marriage Act. Today, we became a slightly more perfect union by recognizing the sanctity of marriage between two individuals, regardless of gender…
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.





