Political Quotes

On the recordJune 20, 2013
I support the tabling of the amendment. There may be some good parts in it, but most of it is bad. The billions of additional taxpayer dollars I cannot support, with all of the billions we already have in here. The biggest reason I will not support it is because it imposes new unrealistic triggers. It says to people, we want to give you the pathway to citizenship, but, guess what. We are going to keep the door closed. You can pretend you are going to get citizenship, but we are going to make it impossible as we have a fully biometric entry-exit system at all air and seaports as a trigger. Most airports will not be able to do this, certainly not the little airports many of us use to fly in and out. That is unrealistic. I appreciate the effort the Senator from Texas has put into this amendment. But I must strongly oppose it. This amendment would impose new, unrealistic triggers that must be met before the pathway to citizenship becomes a reality. To take one example, the amendment includes a fully biometric exit system at all air and seaports as a trigger before those in provisional status can earn green cards. But this presents extensive technological and infrastructure challenges that could take many years to fully address. U.S. airports were not designed to accommodate immigration exit lanes, where biometrics could be collected. This approach will not work. An attainable pathway to citizenship is a central component of this bill.…
Said by
Patrick Leahy
Democratic · Vermont
Source
govinfo.gov
Jun 20, 2013

Share

More from Patrick Leahy

Dec 20, 2022

I am pleased to announce that late last night, I introduced the bipartisan, bicameral, fiscal year 2023 omnibus appropriations bill. This bill invests $772.5 billion in nondefense discretionary programs, including $118.7 billion--a…

govinfo.gov
Dec 15, 2022

a continuing resolution to March 10 is short-sighted and wholly unnecessary. It imperils our national security, and it ignores the real pain and consequences of inflation. Without funding from a full-year omnibus appropriations bill, the…

govinfo.gov
Apr 20, 2023

I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.

congress.gov
Dec 22, 2022

the Johnson amendment asks us to cede the power of the purse to public servants in the executive branch who are unaccountable to the voters. These public servants, dedicated though they may be, cannot possibly share the depth of knowledge…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation