I get concerned when we have to rush things through without the kind of deliberation and scrutiny they deserve. The Senator from Pennsylvania has raised the obvious fact of making, for constitutional purposes, a record demonstrating legislative intent. Among all the suggestions he made, this is one to which we should pay the most attention. Sometimes as we rush--I say that as one who wants to get a terrorism bill up here and voted on, and hoping the House can do the same and we can get on to conference. But, frankly, we can spend a lot of time on this floor sometimes debating matters that are of minuscule moment and we would be better off if we did the kind of long-range thinking that he and others have discussed.
Patrick Leahy: “I get concerned when we have to rush things through without the kind of deliberation and scrutiny they deserve. The…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for deliberation in the context of a terrorism bill.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
Do not turn your material, do not turn your reports over to the Executive Branch and let them tell you what is or is not classified.
Congress was the original classification authority (OCA). It let that power essentially slip away to the Executive Branch.
If we can't clearly and unequivocally condemn the actions of white supremacists, or simply acknowledge the January 6, 2021, attack on our Capitol for what it was, an insurrection, we fan the flames of hatred and violence.
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.





