If my friend from Maryland will yield on that, I will point out the contrast. In 1992 we had a Republican President and a Democratic Senate; we confirmed 11 appellate court judges and 55 district court judges. Four years later you have a Democratic President and a Republican Senate and look at the vast difference: zero appellate court judges and only 17 district court judges, notwithstanding an enormous vacancy rate. I think what it shows is that, if you want something to demonstrate partisanship, when the Democrats controlled the Senate with a Republican President, they still cooperated to give that Republican President a significant number of judges in the second session, in a Presidential election year, the time it normally slows down, as contrasted to the absolute opposite, the unprecedented opposite, of what happened when you have a Democratic President and a Republican Senate.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing judicial confirmations and partisanship in the Senate.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
we have so many things going on in Washington these days, with just about everything from budgetary matters to wrapping up this session of the Congress. I was delighted today to take a step back and, in my role as President pro tempore…
the most important technology connections are ones between people. Vermont is a place where people connecting is not only important to life, but is the very fabric of it. It was natural, I think, for me to see cyberspace as a continuation…
the 11th of December marked the 6-month anniversary of the violent death of widely respected Palestinian- American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh. On May 19, I echoed Secretary of State Blinken's call for an ``independent, credible…
On February 23rd of this year, Senators Schumer and Coburn and I wrote you a letter commending your decision to sever ties with the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR.





