If I may respond without the Senator losing his right to the floor, he is relying on a statute--if I recall, without hearings; there was an amendment to the Sarbanes-Oxley bill a couple years ago on the floor. If we are talking about criminal statutes and changing them by whim, that is one that said no more debate on this. I am bringing up something that was debated rather thoroughly in the Appropriations Committee, including a bill the Senator from Virginia and I voted for last year.
Patrick Leahy: “If I may respond without the Senator losing his right to the floor, he is relying on a statute--if I recall, without…”
On the recordJune 16, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of amendments to the Sarbanes-Oxley bill during Senate debate.
Share
More from Patrick Leahy
Apr 20, 2023
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.
Apr 21, 2023
I can say with absolute certainty that the proposed rules directly conflict with the legislation on a variety of matters, especially on provisions that limit access to the PTAB.
Jun 2, 2025
People in the Trump administration who know nothing and care less about these programs are arbitrarily jeopardizing relations with a strategic partner in one of the most challenging regions of the world.





