On the recordMarch 23, 2023
This is offered in good faith--and I appreciate my colleague--but it is completely unnecessary for the following reason: The White House and the Department of Justice have both stated, there is no one currently detained pursuant to the 2002 authorization. It is not being used as a ground for detaining anyone. I was at the hearing yesterday, and my colleague from Idaho is correct, Secretary Blinken talked about repeal of the 2001 authorization could affect detention and said we should not do a repeal if there is not a replacement. But the administration's position on the 2002 authorization is that there are no military activities, including a single detention, where we are using the 2002 as justification. I would urge my colleagues to vote against the certification requirement. Keep this bill a clean repeal of the 1991 and 2002 authorizations. Vote on Amendment No. 43 The PRESIDING OFFICER. The question now occurs on agreeing to amendment No. 43.





