At this point, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 4167, which is the Restoring Proven Financing for American Employers Act. It was introduced by the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Barr), who we will be hearing from shortly. And I would also like to thank my good friend from New York (Mrs. Maloney), the ranking member of the Capital Markets Subcommittee, for her bipartisan and commonsense work on this important issue as well. Today we have the opportunity to correct, in a strong, bipartisan way, an egregious example of regulatory overreach. For no reason that has been coherently stated by anyone, the banking regulators responsible for implementing the Volcker Rule have included provisions in their final rule that will literally cripple the market for collateralized loan obligations, also called CLOs. See, at the stroke of a pen, the banking regulators are going to wreak havoc on one of the largest and most important sources of financing for literally hundreds of growing companies across this country. If the CLO provisions in the Volcker Rule go forward as planned, there will be a heavy price to pay in failed companies and also lost jobs. So why is the government doing this? Did CLOs do anything to cause the financial crisis? No, they did not. Are CLOs a menace to the stability of our financial system? No, again.…
Share
More from Thomas A. Garrett
I was unable to be in Washington, DC. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 613, ``yea'' on rollcall No. 614, and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 615. ____________________
So we then arrive at the point where the good work of Mr. Engel and Chairman Royce is needed today, and that is what we do. It is with a glad heart that I note the bipartisan nature of these agreements.
I thank the gentleman from South Carolina (Mr. Duncan) for his remarks. Mr. Speaker, how much time do I have remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman has 21 minutes remaining.
I was unable to attend Floor votes due to the expected birth of my child. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 480. ____________________





