It is a simple question to ask, that when you come to the floor with an amendment to say that we're going to take money and yank money out of one agency that has a primary responsibility to the members of the public of this country, to first go to those agencies and ask, well, what impact will they have? It's not a matter whether other amendments are coming down that will have a larger or more de minimis impact. It's incumbent upon the gentleman from Massachusetts to do his research before he comes to the floor with his amendment. I'm sorry to see that he did not. Finally, as well, he comes to the floor with this amendment saying, well, we need to do this action now. Don't look back at their past poor performance. Let's take this action now. I remind the gentleman as the author of the Dodd-Frank reform legislation that his very own legislation mandated a study, it was in section 967, to reform the operation of the SEC and asked to do a study in that to see how their reform has occurred. Why don't we wait for the studies to come out, for the information to come out, to see whether or not the SEC has changed its performance. Even after they've lost their majority, we see the conduct of the SEC and it still continues to fail. Even now we see that they are under investigation by the Inspector General. Why? For allegedly leasing more space before receiving funds to do so. So they've had a poor track record in the past.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker criticizes an amendment regarding funding for the SEC and calls for more research before action.
Share
More from Thomas A. Garrett
I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 546. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro tempore announced that the ayes…
I was unable to attend Floor votes due to the expected birth of my child. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 480. ____________________
In the realm of humanity, that which is cobbled together by humans is rarely perfect. So, too, the tax reform that we undertook today is not perfect; however, it was overdue, and it is good. Candidly, any legislation contemplated that was…
I was unable to be in Washington, DC. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall No. 613, ``yea'' on rollcall No. 614, and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 615. ____________________





