In the end, Mr. Speaker, what we are intending to do here is to allow for the Justice Department to proceed when there is evidence of intentional discrimination. But when there is no evidence whatsoever, when it is purely on statistics, then it should not proceed under that theory of law. With that, I yield back the balance of my time.
Share
More from Thomas A. Garrett
I believe to my very core that the best of the collective is achieved by empowering the individual.
We have an ability--and a responsibility... to be a check on executive power by virtue of speaking when we are in disagreement.
Perhaps have we considered a paradigm wherein we tie aid and development to Afghanistan to eradication efforts?
I would submit that the North Korean regime from 1950 has a history of making a promise and then breaking a promise.
Other voices in this conversation
